Schematic Correspondence and Idealized Structures ( 1970 )

Note that the footnotes have been changed slightly (their numbering and, in one case, the general form). This is because I have not been able to figure out how to use ’1*’, ’2*’, and ’3*’ as footnote references in TeX. (In the German there is a difference between footnotes by Bernays and footnotes by a later editor; the former have ’1’ and ’2’, the latter ’1*’, ’2*’, and ’3*’ as labels.) Note in particular that I collapsed footnotes 1 and 1* into one, for the reason just given. (See also the corresponding comments attached to the footnotes themselves.) Notice also that I have translated “Begriff” as “notion”, not as “concept”; e.g., in “notion of a group”. This may have to be adjusted, especially if the other translations use “concept” throughout. (I used “notion” because it seems more general and less technical, thus in accordance with how Bernays uses “Begriff”.)